no? he didn't to me neither. nor did he say he was engaged. nor did he imply that he was engaged, when he was relentlessly hitting on me and my friend amy (shout out: amy!), buying me drinks, and (yes, it's true) kissing me. as it turns out, however, he is in fact engaged. and not to that woman (catherine zeta-jones or me? who can tell?).here's the thing i don't get. i always felt that the engagement would be the one phase of a relationship in which men are least likely to cheat, no? i mean, you shouldn't propose marriage if you don't want to be faithful, and you aren't married yet so you don't have that whole "stale relationship" excuse. i mean, seriously, kids. what the deal?
(side note: if you know this man, explain to him why his behavior is unacceptable. and suggest to his fiancee that she leave him. i think his name was steve.)
No comments:
Post a Comment